XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/24/26 6:18 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   > On 1/24/2026 1:36 PM, Paul Aubrin wrote:   
   >> Le 22/01/2026 à 20:41, Vincent Maycock a écrit :   
   >>>> Wikipedia is definitely not a legitimate source since climate models   
   >>>> predictions don't match observations.   
   >>> Wikipedia is not the only source that accepts the climate models.   
   >>   
   >> It has been established that climate model computations don't match   
   >> observations over extended past periods (40 years). They have been   
   >> invalidated.   
      
   > Which ones?  Over 100 exist in the IPCC AR6 Assessment; which ones have   
   > been invalidated??   
      
   I've answered this many times. What's going to be different   
   this time?   
      
   If you honestly can't retain information from thread to thread,   
   post to post, why are you even hear? What do you expect to   
   learn? You're certainly not going to convince anyone who didn't   
   already agree with you, displaying THAT kind of stupidity...   
      
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)