Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,467 of 95,770    |
|    dart200 to JTEM    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    25 Jan 26 00:45:24    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, soc.history.ancient       XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.messianic       From: user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid              On 1/24/26 10:35 PM, JTEM wrote:       > On 1/23/26 1:00 AM, dart200 wrote:       >       >> i'm sorry, did i post any predictions? no       >       > Then AGW isn't science. Because you can't have a       > valid hypothesis without predictions.              my nigga, that downward trend is pure observation...              form ur own conclusions moron,              and don't come to the wrong one ehh????              >       > But you can and have paraded your narcissism, again.       >       > It's not about you. Did you not know this? Honestly?       >       > Omg, YOU HAD TO BE TOLD THAT IT'S NOT ABOUT YOU?!?!?       >       > Wow. On a scale of 1 to 10 you're an 11th level       > narcissist!       >       no idea wtf ur talking about really              --       hi, i'm nick! let's end war 🙃              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca