Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,468 of 95,770    |
|    Paul Aubrin to All    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    25 Jan 26 12:19:41    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, soc.history.ancient       XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.messianic       From: paul.aubrin@invalid.org              Le 25/01/2026 à 09:45, dart200 a écrit :       > On 1/24/26 10:35 PM, JTEM wrote:       >> On 1/23/26 1:00 AM, dart200 wrote:       >>       >>> i'm sorry, did i post any predictions? no       >>       >> Then AGW isn't science. Because you can't have a       >> valid hypothesis without predictions.       >       > my nigga, that downward trend is pure observation...       >       > form ur own conclusions moron,       >       > and don't come to the wrong one ehh????              Climate change hypothesis were embeded in CMIP climate models.       Climate models output don't match reality. Climate model output       variations don't mactch observations variations over long periods.       Current climate change hypothesis have been falsified.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca