Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
| sci.skeptic | Skeptics discussing pseudo-science | 95,770 messages |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
| Message 95,470 of 95,770 |
| Paul Aubrin to All |
| Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis |
| 25 Jan 26 12:31:36 |
XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism From: paul.aubrin@invalid.org Le 25/01/2026 à 00:18, Dawn Flood a écrit : >> It has been established that climate model computations don't match >> observations over extended past periods (40 years). They have been >> invalidated. >> > > Which ones? Over 100 exist in the IPCC AR6 Assessment; which ones have > been invalidated?? If climate science was a real science, there would be one or two competing sets of hypothesis (and models). None of the current CMIP6 models match observations, their hypothesis are invalidated. All are erroneous. --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca