Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,474 of 95,770    |
|    Dude to Paul Aubrin    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    25 Jan 26 11:05:09    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, soc.history.ancient       XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.messianic       From: punditster@gmail.com              On 1/25/2026 3:19 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote:       > Le 25/01/2026 à 09:45, dart200 a écrit :       >> On 1/24/26 10:35 PM, JTEM wrote:       >>> On 1/23/26 1:00 AM, dart200 wrote:       >>>       >>>> i'm sorry, did i post any predictions? no       >>>       >>> Then AGW isn't science. Because you can't have a       >>> valid hypothesis without predictions.       >>       >> my nigga, that downward trend is pure observation...       >>       >> form ur own conclusions moron,       >>       >> and don't come to the wrong one ehh????       >       > Climate change hypothesis were embeded in CMIP climate models.       > Climate models output don't match reality. Climate model output       > variations don't mactch observations variations over long periods.       > Current climate change hypothesis have been falsified.        >       Finally! Something interesting to talk about: the weather.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca