XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, soc.history.ancient   
   XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.messianic   
   From: user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   On 1/25/26 3:19 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote:   
   > Le 25/01/2026 à 09:45, dart200 a écrit :   
   >> On 1/24/26 10:35 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >>> On 1/23/26 1:00 AM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> i'm sorry, did i post any predictions? no   
   >>>   
   >>> Then AGW isn't science. Because you can't have a   
   >>> valid hypothesis without predictions.   
   >>   
   >> my nigga, that downward trend is pure observation...   
   >>   
   >> form ur own conclusions moron,   
   >>   
   >> and don't come to the wrong one ehh????   
   >   
   > Climate change hypothesis were embeded in CMIP climate models.   
   > Climate models output don't match reality. Climate model output   
   > variations don't mactch observations variations over long periods.   
   > Current climate change hypothesis have been falsified.   
      
   again, i didn't even post a model, i posted observations ...   
      
   --   
   hi, i'm nick! let's end war 🙃   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)