XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, alt.messianic   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/26/2026 12:36 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote:   
   > Le 25/01/2026 à 17:43, Dawn Flood a écrit :   
   >> Google "The Canon of Eclipses"; note the date that it was written.   
   >> Let's assume that AGW has been falsified; in your opinion, does this   
   >> preclude any future climate models from having any scientific validity??   
   >   
   > Once a model has been invalidated because it doesn't match observations,   
   > it is invalidated forever. Other models, with different sets of   
   > hypothesis may be tried, but as "climate" is, according to the IPCC, 30   
   > years or more, you won't know really what they are worth before 2056.   
   >   
      
   And, so, even if a model has a flaw, which is corrected later on, that   
   model is still "forever invalid"??  Ever hear of Professor Andrew Wiles'   
   proof of Fermat's Last Theorem?  It took him a couple iterations to get   
   every minuscule detail of that one exact.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)