Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,495 of 95,770    |
|    Dawn Flood to Paul Aubrin    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    26 Jan 26 08:18:01    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 1/26/2026 1:13 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote:       > Le 25/01/2026 à 15:36, Vincent Maycock a écrit :       >> Arctic ice is decreasing, regardless of whether some people quoted on       >> Facebook speculated about the extent of that process. Also,       >> meteorology is not an exact science like physics, and you don't       >> consider your weekly local weather forecast to be "falsified" if it       >> predicts rain and you just get a cloudy day sometimes.       >       > Nostradamus predictions are said to sometimes match reality. Would you       > say that Nostradamus forecasting method is valid ?       > Weather forecast match quite well reality for the next 10 or 12 days.       > Beyond that they are useless. The validity domain of weather forecasts       > is observed to be a few days. The validity domain of CMIP models has       > been observed to be nil.       >       >              Weather is different than climate.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca