Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,507 of 95,770    |
|    Dawn Flood to JTEM    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    26 Jan 26 18:20:21    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, alt.messianic       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 1/26/2026 11:22 AM, JTEM wrote:       > On 1/26/26 1:54 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:       >       >> And, so, even if a model has a flaw, which is corrected later on       >       > ...only to fail again. So it's corrected later on, only to       > fail again. So they correct it later on, and it fails yet again...       >       > This has been going on since at least the 1980s. Which means at       > least four decades of failed predictions.              Okay, fine. Then, if what you are saying is true, then future climate       is unpredictable, which means that temperatures may go down by 10C or       they may go up by 10C over the next century or two. In any case, this       means that you are in the same boat as everyone else, in that you cannot       say anything about what is going to happen (or not) in the future.              And, so, even if the models are wrong, you yourselves cannot do any       better, because, unlike the models, you can offer no predictions whatsoever.              Dawn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca