XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism   
   From: paul.aubrin@invalid.org   
      
   Le 27/01/2026 à 07:36, Vincent Maycock a écrit :   
   > I thought they had gotten the stratosphere prediction right (like it   
   > was the fingerprint of human beings on climate change).   
      
   You don't think correctly. And more, if a model (a set of hypothesis)   
   fails over a period of time, it can fail any time again.   
      
   You only need a large number of "models". It will be very likely that   
   one of them will make a good prediction..   
   The IPCC made 108 runs of 34 models. That is enough to always find one   
   that made some good "prediction" at some moment.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)