Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,527 of 95,770    |
|    Dawn Flood to JTEM    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    27 Jan 26 07:29:01    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, alt.messianic       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 1/26/2026 9:18 PM, JTEM wrote:       > On 1/26/26 7:23 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:       >> On 1/26/2026 12:39 PM, Paul Aubrin wrote:       >>> Le 26/01/2026 à 14:59, Dawn Flood a écrit :       >>>> Once again, if Arctic Sea disappears during some summer in the 2030s       >>>> or 40s, how would you explain that?!       >>>       >>> To day I danced a rain dance. If it rains tomorrow, how would you       >>> explain that ?       >>>       >>       >> Only if your predictions can constitute a statistically significant       >       > You lick the sphincter of Gwobull Warbling hysterics -- really lap       > at it with your greedy tongue -- despite more than 40 years of       > failed predictions, but you'd never take a CONFIRMED prediction       > unless you feel like declaring it "Statistically significant."       >       > Yeah, you're a twat.       >              As I said, look at Dr. Roy Spencer's website and test the coefficient of       the time series regression for yourself; even his datasets (which he       updates monthly) shows an upward trend. Now, extend that line for 1,000       years and get back to us.              Dawn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca