home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.skeptic      Skeptics discussing pseudo-science      95,770 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 95,527 of 95,770   
   Dawn Flood to JTEM   
   Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis    
   27 Jan 26 07:29:01   
   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, alt.messianic   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/26/2026 9:18 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 1/26/26 7:23 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >> On 1/26/2026 12:39 PM, Paul Aubrin wrote:   
   >>> Le 26/01/2026 à 14:59, Dawn Flood a écrit :   
   >>>> Once again, if Arctic Sea disappears during some summer in the 2030s   
   >>>> or 40s, how would you explain that?!   
   >>>   
   >>> To day I danced a rain dance. If it rains tomorrow, how would you   
   >>> explain that ?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Only if your predictions can constitute a statistically significant   
   >   
   > You lick the sphincter of Gwobull Warbling hysterics -- really lap   
   > at it with your greedy tongue -- despite more than 40 years of   
   > failed predictions, but you'd never take a CONFIRMED prediction   
   > unless you feel like declaring it "Statistically significant."   
   >   
   > Yeah, you're a twat.   
   >   
      
   As I said, look at Dr. Roy Spencer's website and test the coefficient of   
   the time series regression for yourself; even his datasets (which he   
   updates monthly) shows an upward trend.  Now, extend that line for 1,000   
   years and get back to us.   
      
   Dawn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca