Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,528 of 95,770    |
|    Dawn Flood to Paul Aubrin    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    27 Jan 26 07:32:41    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, alt.messianic       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 1/27/2026 12:19 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote:       > Le 27/01/2026 à 01:27, Dawn Flood a écrit :       >>> CMIP models made a lot of predictions. They have been compared with       >>> observations. No CMIP model could match reality in all four domains       >>> of the atmosphere.       >>> NB : If your prediction fails, your set of hypothesis is erroneous.       >>>       >>       >> One could make the exact same claims about Newton's Laws; they all,       >> without exception, fail;       >       > Certainly not. We experimentally tested Newton's law in school and it       > matched very well observations.              They do! But, General Relativity does much better, and so, does such       invalidate Newton?? In addition, Newton's third law does not describe       the forces of electromagnetism; does that invalidate it, also??              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca