home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.skeptic      Skeptics discussing pseudo-science      95,770 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 95,541 of 95,770   
   Dawn Flood to Paul Aubrin   
   Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis    
   27 Jan 26 12:50:05   
   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, alt.messianic   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/27/2026 12:24 PM, Paul Aubrin wrote:   
   > Le 27/01/2026 à 14:32, Dawn Flood a écrit :   
   >>> Certainly not. We experimentally tested Newton's law in school and it   
   >>> matched very well observations.   
   >>   
   >> They do!  But, General Relativity does much better, and so, does such   
   >> invalidate Newton??  In addition, Newton's third law does not describe   
   >> the forces of electromagnetism; does that invalidate it, also??   
   >   
   > Relativity has an extended domain of validity. CMIP models have a non-   
   > existent domain of validity.   
      
   Let's assume that you are correct, then; explain the regression equation   
   and do it in the other thread.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca