home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.skeptic      Skeptics discussing pseudo-science      95,770 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 95,560 of 95,770   
   jojo to Dawn Flood   
   Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis    
   28 Jan 26 21:58:37   
   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, alt.messianic   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   Dawn Flood wrote:   
   > On 1/27/2026 12:24 PM, Paul Aubrin wrote:   
   >> Le 27/01/2026 à 14:32, Dawn Flood a écrit :   
   >>>> Certainly not. We experimentally tested Newton's law in   
   >>>> school and it matched very well observations.   
   >>>   
   >>> They do!  But, General Relativity does much better, and so,   
   >>> does such invalidate Newton??  In addition, Newton's third law   
   >>> does not describe the forces of electromagnetism; does that   
   >>> invalidate it, also??   
   >>   
   >> Relativity has an extended domain of validity. CMIP models have   
   >> a non- existent domain of validity.   
   >   
   > Let's assume that you are correct, then; explain the regression   
   > equation and do it in the other thread.   
      
   i intend to participate in this thread at a later date.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca