Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,560 of 95,770    |
|    jojo to Dawn Flood    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    28 Jan 26 21:58:37    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, alt.messianic       From: f00@0f0.00f              Dawn Flood wrote:       > On 1/27/2026 12:24 PM, Paul Aubrin wrote:       >> Le 27/01/2026 à 14:32, Dawn Flood a écrit :       >>>> Certainly not. We experimentally tested Newton's law in       >>>> school and it matched very well observations.       >>>       >>> They do! But, General Relativity does much better, and so,       >>> does such invalidate Newton?? In addition, Newton's third law       >>> does not describe the forces of electromagnetism; does that       >>> invalidate it, also??       >>       >> Relativity has an extended domain of validity. CMIP models have       >> a non- existent domain of validity.       >       > Let's assume that you are correct, then; explain the regression       > equation and do it in the other thread.              i intend to participate in this thread at a later date.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca