Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,608 of 95,770    |
|    Paul Aubrin to All    |
|    Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis     |
|    01 Feb 26 08:03:13    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism       From: paul.aubrin@invalid.org              Le 01/02/2026 à 05:43, Dawn Flood a écrit :       > On 1/31/2026 10:32 PM, Paul Aubrin wrote:       >> Le 01/02/2026 à 02:56, Dawn Flood a écrit :       >>>>> And, so, you acknowledge climate feed backs just so long as humans       >>>>> are not involved?       >>>>       >>>> CO2 variations, follow temperature variations.       >>>       >>> Do you understand the Conservation of Mass?       >>       >> Diversion (stratagem). Your feedBACK happens BEFORE its cause. That's       >> weird in physics isn't it ? Time in climastrology can flow backward ?       >>       >       > No, it does not.              Of course it does, because temperature variations occur BEFORE carbon       dioxide variations.       Now, let us suppose that carbon dioxide cause a substantial (x2)       increase in temperatures. The "climate system" would be unstable for       small variations of CO2 concentrations. It is not : those variations       occur EACH YEAR and temperatures oscillate gently.       The transistions between ice ages and inter-glacials precede CO2       variations, thus, again, CO2 cannot be the cause. Astronomical       parameters obviously play a role, but probably not exclusive.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca