Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,650 of 95,770    |
|    JTEM to All    |
|    CAUGHT! NASA changes data and peer revie    |
|    12 Feb 26 22:49:16    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.paranormal       From: jtem01@gmail.com              DISCLAIMER:              This isn't about the Gwobull Warbling hoax. Not directly.       But it does establish AS FACT key points that the Useful       Idiots deny are possible. And they are...              #1. NASA fudges their data, sometimes for the worst, most       trivial reasons.              It's petty!              "Oh no, NASA wouldn't fudge their data for a massive       global scam like AGW. They only do it for the most trivial,       absolute most petty reasons!"                     #2. Peer Review is a joke.              It's "Gate Keeping." He uses the term in the video, which       is ironic, because they didn't even bother with the so called       "Peer Review." They just rejected him!                            So here's an actual example where NASA corrupted their own       data -- pure fraud -- AND an actual example where a "Peer       Reviewed" journal refused a paper that was scientifically       valid:              https://youtu.be/J6hWZ6azItI?si=bPF9MTeY35E9HxGB                     This is massive fuel for the conspiracy buffs, too. This is       a fascinating topic -- interstellar objects entering our       solar system -- and NASA changed their data, corrupted their       own data to hide them. AND THEN a "Peer Reviewed" journal       decided these were of zero interest to anyone and refused to       so much as entertain the paper!              NOTE: Officially, humans have only recently discovered our       first ever interstellar object. AND THEN, after discovering       that VERY FIRST ONE, figured out that an earlier object had       to be interstellar as well. So this is CUTTING EDGE!              2017.              Our study of interstellar objects BEGINS in 2017.              3.              Officially, we have only ever discovered 3.              This is ALL NEW! This is absolute CUTTING EDGE and NASA is       corrupting their own data to hide them, and a so called       "Peer Review" journal is dismissing them as uninteresting!              Either they're hiding something (conspiracy theory) or these       are the most foul, petty, close minded idiots on earth, and       you Gwobull Warblers have them up on a pedestal!              Which is it?              One of them has to be true. Pick one. Defend your position.                            And, oh: STOP pretending that NASA would ever "Report"       bullshit and pretend it's science!              And STOP pretending that "Peer Review" is Latin for       "Integrity."                                                                             --       https://jtem.tumblr.com/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca