home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.skeptic      Skeptics discussing pseudo-science      95,770 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 95,650 of 95,770   
   JTEM to All   
   CAUGHT! NASA changes data and peer revie   
   12 Feb 26 22:49:16   
   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.paranormal   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   DISCLAIMER:   
      
   This isn't about the Gwobull Warbling hoax. Not directly.   
   But it does establish AS FACT key points that the Useful   
   Idiots deny are possible. And they are...   
      
   #1.  NASA fudges their data, sometimes for the worst, most   
   trivial reasons.   
      
   It's petty!   
      
   "Oh no, NASA wouldn't fudge their data for a massive   
   global scam like AGW. They only do it for the most trivial,   
   absolute most petty reasons!"   
      
      
   #2.  Peer Review is a joke.   
      
   It's "Gate Keeping." He uses the term in the video, which   
   is ironic, because they didn't even bother with the so called   
   "Peer Review." They just rejected him!   
      
      
      
   So here's an actual example where NASA corrupted their own   
   data -- pure fraud -- AND an actual example where a "Peer   
   Reviewed" journal refused a paper that was scientifically   
   valid:   
      
   https://youtu.be/J6hWZ6azItI?si=bPF9MTeY35E9HxGB   
      
      
   This is massive fuel for the conspiracy buffs, too. This is   
   a fascinating topic -- interstellar objects entering our   
   solar system -- and NASA changed their data, corrupted their   
   own data to hide them. AND THEN a "Peer Reviewed" journal   
   decided these were of zero interest to anyone and refused to   
   so much as entertain the paper!   
      
   NOTE:  Officially, humans have only recently discovered our   
   first ever interstellar object. AND THEN, after discovering   
   that VERY FIRST ONE, figured out that an earlier object had   
   to be interstellar as well. So this is CUTTING EDGE!   
      
   2017.   
      
   Our study of interstellar objects BEGINS in 2017.   
      
   3.   
      
   Officially, we have only ever discovered 3.   
      
   This is ALL NEW! This is absolute CUTTING EDGE and NASA is   
   corrupting their own data to hide them, and a so called   
   "Peer Review" journal is dismissing them as uninteresting!   
      
   Either they're hiding something (conspiracy theory) or these   
   are the most foul, petty, close minded idiots on earth, and   
   you Gwobull Warblers have them up on a pedestal!   
      
   Which is it?   
      
   One of them has to be true. Pick one. Defend your position.   
      
      
      
   And, oh:  STOP pretending that NASA would ever "Report"   
   bullshit and pretend it's science!   
      
   And STOP pretending that "Peer Review" is Latin for   
   "Integrity."   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca