Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,744 of 95,770    |
|    JTEM to Paul Aubrin    |
|    Re: So it turns out emissions are GREAT     |
|    20 Feb 26 13:20:08    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming       From: jtem01@gmail.com              On 2/20/26 7:57 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote:              > Waste, trash, garbage for some living things can be useful for others.       > Exemple : mushrooms grow on manure.       > Every animal exhales carbon dioxide as a waste of internal energy       > production, but it is the only source of carbon atoms for plants.              The earliest -- or most of the earliest -- life on earth was       anaerobic. For it, oxygen was a waste product, a poison! They       expelled oxygen, yes, but they could no more live with it than       people can survive eating poop...              Eventually the atmosphere of the planet earth because so       saturated with oxygen that strange things began to happen. I       mean, things actually began to rust!              "Oxidation" occurred.              AND one other interesting thing is that it sparked the planets       first mass extinction event!              Life, or most life at least, was anaerobic, all the oxygen was       literally poison to it, and yet there was so much life       excreting so much oxygen for so long that the atmosphere become       saturated with the stuff!              Things died. Most things died... mass extinction.              > Why do you think that no idea is worth saying except if it has been       > published in an academic paper ?              Avi Loeb just had a "Peer Reviewed" journal refuse to so much as       allow him the courtesy of this "Peer Review," explaining that a       paper on a couple of new interstellar objects -- when there's only       been THREE officially recognized so far -- wasn't of interest...              I personally lost all faith in "Scientific Journals" many years       ago, when one in particular mercilessly trashed the Oral Vaccine       Theory on the origins of AIDS in the Congo, the journal using       transparently vulgar pseudo science, and one of the editors went       so far as to explain that he feared the theory would endanger       (western) public health initiatives, particularly vaccines.              So it wasn't because the letters/papers, the theory itself, wasn't       scientifically valid. It was because a valid theory pinning AIDS       on a vaccine might stop people from trusting vaccines...              Not "Science" but a social program.              We see this in a lot of areas, not just public health and AGW.              Science is gone. We need to fight to get it back.              We've lost too much already, including countless lives, on shit       replacing science.                                   --       https://jtem.tumblr.com/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca