XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.global-warming, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: paul.aubrin@invalid.org   
      
   Le 24/02/2026 à 18:10, Vincent Maycock a écrit :   
   > On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 17:02:14 +0100, Paul Aubrin   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Le 24/02/2026 à 16:54, Vincent Maycock a écrit :   
   >>>> And it precedes in geological (proxy) records by ~800 years too !   
   >>>> What other effect do you know which comes before its supposed cause ?   
   >>>> Weird isn't it ?   
   >>> Apparently it's part of a feedback loop:   
   >>   
   >> But CO2 variations follow temperature variations at all time scales (in   
   >> observations).   
   >> A cause never follows its consequence.   
   >   
   >  From the site you snipped:   
      
   Observations show that CO2 concentration variations follow temperature   
   variations, not the other way.   
      
   >   
   > https://skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature-intermediate.htm   
      
   Even if a Scientific Authority as prestigious as "Skeptical Science"   
   says it, if is not what is observed in reality, I won't trust them.   
      
   A question (please answer it honestly) which curve variations peak   
   first, the red one or the green one ?   
      
   https://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/derivative/mean:12/mea   
   :14/from:1958/normalise/plot/esrl-co2/derivative/mean:12/mean:14   
   scale:20/detrend:3/from:1958/normalise   
      
      
   [ ] the red curve   
   [ ] the green curve   
      
   Red : GISStemp variations   
   Green : Mauna Loa CO2 ppm variations   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)