XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.global-warming, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats
From: sam@spade.invalid
Paul Aubrin wrote:
> Le 26/02/2026 à 11:30, Samuel Spade a écrit :
> >>> What effect does this processing have on phase distortion? The phase
> >>> relationship between temp and CO2 is, after all, what you are hanging
> >>> your causal hat upon, right?
> >>>
> >>> To answer to all this would plunge us ass-deep into laplace and
> >>> z-transforms. May I presume you haven't done that?
> > I take the nonresponse as a "no I haven't".
>
> I studied that at the university (signal processing).
Then you should have known better.
> An industry
> scientist
Oil industry or coal?
> thought us the double mean trick (and its frequency domain
Double mean trick? So there's deception afoot?
> correspondance). Using the same filter on both series makes an eventual
> "distortion" the same for the two series.
Except you used different filters on the two. Filters you didn't or
won't characterize, or you don't understand.
You seem not to realize that differentiating the time domain function
f(t) has a transfer function H(s)=s, the laplace variable itself.
> Actually, the whole thing
> compares the desaisonnalized monthly variations of both series.
> If you still have a doubt, the wood for trees graphing tool has a
> fourrier transform tool. The final result is the same.
Great. Do it and get back to us with the details, including transfer
functions of the whole process and expected phase shift for each.
In the meantime, your claim that a rise in global temp leads the rise in
CO2 is just wishful hoooraah.
Please do keep working on it.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
