Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 104,678 of 106,651    |
|    David Spain to All    |
|    Re: The Rocket Motor of the Future Breat    |
|    29 Jun 20 10:25:56    |
      From: nospam@127.0.0.1              It took forever for this article to finally getting around to mentioning       the technological leader, the Sabre engine from Reaction Engines.       Almost no mention of how a "Fenris" engine works. You have to follow the       link "Fenris" which takes you to a non-patent office page of what       appears to be a patent application, but isn't? It does look different in       fundamental design from the Sabre. But the lead illustration in the       Wired article is the Reaction Engine's Sabre engine not the Fenris. I       wouldn't be too happy with that if I were from Reaction Engines. I       haven't had time yet to study the Fenris, so I have no clue as to how it       works and in what ways it is different from a Sabre engine.              As Henry Spencer points out (again and again) LOX is cheap and       plentiful. These air breathing designs are optimizing for the wrong part       of the problem. You'd have to get enormous reuse out of these systems to       compete with a single Falcon Heavy launch. And once Starship becomes       fully operational, well, maybe they could launch Skylons out the cargo bay.              I wish these designs good luck from an engineering prospective I think       they are very interesting. Will they ever compete against traditional       two stage rockets? It could be the Stanley Steamer vs. the Gasoline       Engine all over again. I suspect these systems have a much better future       as quick deploy crewed military vehicles rather than cargo lifters.       There just isn't enough oomph there. And don't forget Starship in its       two stage version is also fully reusable w/o the technical complications       of a bleeding edge engine.              BTW if you an basing your fuel around the hyper hard to handle liquid       hydrogen in order to make the Reaction Engine work at all, you are       really really up against the fuel density issue.              Or as Ben Rich called them, Wide-Bodied Dogs....              Dave              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca