Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 104,682 of 106,651    |
|    David Spain to JF Mezei    |
|    Re: Tank ruptures at Boca Chica    |
|    30 Jun 20 10:38:14    |
      From: nospam@127.0.0.1              On 2020-06-29 4:34 PM, JF Mezei wrote:       > On 2020-06-28 17:03, Niklas Holsti wrote:       >       >> Who says "no venting"?       >       > I would have thought that you'd want to conserve all your fuel and LOX       > for such a long trip, otherwise you need to bring along a lot more. Then       > again, it comes down to mass of exttra fuel you'll be venting vs mass of       > extra strength in tank to contain it.       >       > Just realised that for O2, venting it might simply release it to the       > ECLSS system for the occupants.       >       > So that leaves methane that is continiously lost.       >       >       >> In the SpaceX videos of Mars trips (quite old already...) the Starship       >> points its rear end (rocket end) at the Sun,       >       > In the case of the shuttle, were the H2 and O2 tanks used for the fuel       > cells and ECLSS contain has or liquid ? Was the "natural" venting from       > boiling at a rate that pretty much matched the need for these gases for       > both fuel cells and ECLSS?       >       > In the case of the Apollo service module, was it aslo self contained       > without need to "contain" high pressures because it assumed O2 and H2       > would remain below -183°? Surely they weren't always sheltered from the       > sun? (and being covered by the outer skin of ship, would have internal       > heat of craft reflect onto tanks).       >              I vaguely remember that for Apollo at least the O2 was kept in some kind       of solid/liquid slurry. Kinda of like an Oxygen slushy. And hence the       need to do "cryostirs" that led to the explosive disaster on Apollo 13       when a routine cryostir triggered an explosion due to the mishandling of       the Service Module tanks during assembly at the Cape weeks before. My       memory may be faulty on this, a quick Google search would make it clear.       Sometimes, it's just quicker to put a faulty memory out here and give       others the pleasure of making a correction, and then there are those       that correct the correctors, etc. See, making it fun for everyone! :-)                     > Were there other crafts that were built with cryo propellants uses that       > were contained for more than a few hours?       >              If you post these questions to Henry Spencer on the ARocket mailing       list, I have no doubt you will get the correct answers from [his] memory...              > http://www.arocketry.net/              I would have to look it up. You can too.              Dave              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca