Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 104,696 of 106,651    |
|    David Spain to JF Mezei    |
|    Re: SN5 about to get wet, and maybe glow    |
|    13 Jul 20 00:14:41    |
      From: nospam@127.0.0.1              On 2020-07-12 8:22 PM, JF Mezei wrote:       > Was there any confirmation of the cause of the SN4 instant explosion?       > (I assume internally they know).       >       >              Last I read it was due to problems with the methane line quick       disconnects in the test stand. They properly disconnected but failed       spectacularly during reconnect. Allowing methane to leak massively until       it diffused enough to catch fire and explode in a fuel/air explosion.       I'm assuming the source of the leak was the fuel tank of SN4 itself       since upstream supply valves should have been closed to prevent leaks       from the methane supply lines. But I do not know this to be fact. Since       the fire and explosion blew SN4 off the test stand and not the supply       lines or tanks, this is probably a safe assumption.The tweet from Elon       mentioned a problem with the disconnects but not the exact issue. I'm       not sure where I got the re-connect issue description from, might have       been from a web forum I read. But it would make some sense. I had       experience with hydraulic quick disconnects in my youth. Usually a       disconnect was not nearly as hard as a connect in my experience.              Dave              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca