Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 104,704 of 106,651    |
|    David Spain to All    |
|    Artemis 8    |
|    18 Jul 20 10:35:25    |
      From: nospam@127.0.0.1              Robert Zubrin proposes using a modified crew Dragon and two SpaceX       launches (F9 and FH) with a rendezvous and dock in LEO with the Falcon       Heavy upper stage in order to do a crewed lunar flyby or a lunar orbital       mission this year.              The goal is to keep space alive in the public's imagination in order to       prolong the political will to do Artemis post-election regardless of the       winner.              OTOH it is hard to see, unlike with Apollo 8 and in the absence of any       follow-on hardware, where this is anything more than a publicity stunt.       In lieu of actually being able to land crew on the moon, in fact, having       to wait years more to accomplish this, might not reflect well on       Artemis. Compared to the Apollo Program. Which did exactly that 6 months       later.              There is also (always) the element of risk to be factored. In pressing       ahead to do this quickly.              We are at this strange stage in crewed space however. With some       acceptance of risk (and not that much more than that we faced with       Apollo) we actually have now IN HAND the ability to access cis-lunar       space with very little additional hardware or difficulty.              Its strange to be in a place where we no longer have to ask how only why?              Dave              https://www.thespacereview.com/article/3980/1              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca