Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 104,708 of 106,651    |
|    Alain Fournier to David Spain    |
|    Re: Artemis 8    |
|    18 Jul 20 19:31:01    |
      From: alain245@videotron.ca              On Jul/18/2020 at 16:35, David Spain wrote :       > On 2020-07-18 11:56 AM, Alain Fournier wrote:       >> Personally, I don't see the point. I'm waiting for Starship and New       >> Armstrong to fly. Once those rockets are flying (at least one of       >> them), making plans for Lunar missions will be much easier. If those       >> rockets work as expected, it seems to me that someone somewhere will       >> obviously decide to plan a mission, if not to the moon, then to Mars,       >> probably both.       >       > While I largely agree, I credit Dr. Zubrin for often pointing out the       > path not taken. (Mars Direct, Moon Direct, etc.). I used to be a critic       > of the Zubrin approach, esp. one-way crewed missions to Mars. Still not       > a particular fan of that idea, but I have to give credit to Dr. Zubrin       > for making a whole lot more from a whole lot less.              I very much like Mars Direct and Dr Zubrin (I'm not sure of the details       of Moon Direct). It is only this Artemis 8 that I am complaining about.       Mars Direct is a bold plan to do great things. Artemis 8 is a hastily       elaborated plan to redo something that was done more than 50 years ago.              > We actually have largely in hand the infrastructure needed to go back to       > the Moon. In Falcon and Dragon. Modifications would be needed but not       > necessarily massive changes. Instead we wait for better solutions,       > whether it be SLS/Orion/EUS/Artemis-lander or Starship or New Armstrong.       >       > SLS/Orion/... being the worst examples in my opinion.       >       > I am convinced we could be back on the Moon within a few years time had       > the money spent on SLS/Orion etc. instead been used to evolve Falcon and       > Crew Dragon. I don't see the compelling reason to wait for Starship.       > It'll be grand once it is there, but NASA didn't need to wait for it but       > could have invested in what SpaceX already has at hand today. If only.              Yes but I don't see the point in going in lunar orbit using rockets that       most likely won't be used to put people on the moon. If I thought that       Artemis 8 would help prepare future lunar missions using Starship it       might make sense to do this. But I really don't think that an Artemis 8       mission would help in anyway. The astronauts flying Artemis 8 would       probably enjoy the ride very much, but I don't see what the mission       would give other than that pleasure for its crew.                     Alain Fournier              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca