Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 104,731 of 106,651    |
|    Alain Fournier to JF Mezei    |
|    Re: Meteors and Earth's orbit    |
|    12 Aug 20 21:57:29    |
      From: alain245@videotron.ca              On Aug/12/2020 at 19:43, JF Mezei wrote :       > On 2020-08-12 15:32, Snidely wrote:       >>> Comet Swift-Tuttle last reached perihelion – closest point to the sun       – in       >>> December 1992 and will do so next in July 2126.       >>>        >       > Thanks was unaware of the link between the two.       >       > I recall meteor showers in august since I was a kid. Does this mean that       > prior to 1992, the showers I saw were leftovers from Swift Tuttle's 1858       > crossing of Earth's orbital path leaving a trail of debris that is so       > longthat we get some every time we pass through that path in August for       > 134 years until comet passes again?              No, the showers that you saw were leftovers from Swift-Tuttle's passing       long before 1858. The debris Swift-Tuttle left in 1858 are still near       the comet, so they weren't hitting Earth in 1989 or in 1995 when       Swift-Tuttle was far from Earth. The debris Swift-Tuttle has shed in say       188 can be quite far from the comet by now and can hit Earth many years       before or after the comet passes close to Earth.              > The comet has no precession and always passes through the exact same       > spot at its perigee, a spot which corresponds to where Earth passes       > roughly august 11 ?              Swift-Tuttle has a period of about 133 years. Its precession will change       its orbit by a very small amount every 133 years. By the time precession       will have a significant effect, the comet will probably be dead.              > is it correct to state that the debris left by Swift Tuttle rekain in       > the same orbit as the comet, with same energy/speed/altitude form sun       > and same eccentricity? Over time, would debris tenmd to clump together       > due to each rock's gravity and all of then traveling at same speed/vector ?              They follow orbital paths very close to the path of the comet, but not       exactly the same. We are talking about debris about the size of grains       of sand, their gravity is negligible, so they won't clump together. With       time, they tend to spread out, that is why we get the meteor showers       even on years were the comet is far away.                     Alain Fournier              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca