Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 104,741 of 106,651    |
|    Alain Fournier to All    |
|    Re: Launch efficency based on latitude    |
|    16 Aug 20 17:58:46    |
      From: alain245@videotron.ca              Le Aug/16/2020 à 16:29, JF Mezei a écrit :       > On 2020-08-16 11:19, Jeff Findley wrote:       >       >> The problem with the shuttle was that the penalty to launch into a       >> higher inclination orbit applies to all the mass put into orbit.       >       >       > But why is there a penalty?       >       > When you laiunch from 28°, Earth gives you 1471kmh horizontal speed vector.       >       > If you head for a 28° inclination, you add energy in the same direction       > as where you were going. The resulting orbit consists of the 1471       > horizontal push and whatever energy you added to it to get to 25,000kmh.       > Right?       >       >       > So if you head to a 51° orbit from 28", you start with a 1471kmh       > eastbound vector, and instead of adding your energy in the same       > direction, you add diagonally. The resulting speed vector is a       > compnination of hoziozontal and vertical, with the horizontal being       > bigged than the 1471 push you got at launch.       >       > But either way, don't you get the same energy at launch, and don't you       > add the same acceleration amount to reach 25,000km ?       >       >       > If you go polar, then your horizontal component is smaller than the       > speed given by earth at launch, so you have to spend fuel to counter it.       > If you go lower than 28", then the vertical speed you got from launching       > at 28° has to be countered and you need to position yourself over       > equator. So that costs fuel.       >       > But what I don't understand is why launching from 28 to a 51°       > inclination would cost more fuel since the full amount of push you get       > at launch is used and included in your final orbit speed.              As I explained in another post it is about a lost of efficiency because       Earths rotation is not in the right direction. It is a little like if       you want to go to a position 1km east and 1 km north from where you are.       Because of the Pythagorean theorem, you don't need to do 2 km to get to       where you want to go, you use the diagonal which is of length square       root of 2, about 1.41 km, instead of doing 1 km east then 1 km north,       which would be 2 km. Now if some one gives you a lift to go to that 1 km       east and 1 km north position, lets say he brings you 1/2 km east, it       helps you but not as much as if he had brought you 1/2 km in the north       east direction.              It's the same for reaching orbit, Earth's rotation helps you if you are       heading to a 51° orbit from 28°, but not as much as if the rotation of       Earth was in the right direction.                     Alain Fournier              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca