Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 104,748 of 106,651    |
|    frank.scrooby@gmail.com to All    |
|    Is anyone playing catch-up to SpaceX?    |
|    18 Aug 20 03:20:33    |
      Greetings all,              SpaceX has clearly demonstrated that their methods and procedures are working.       They're the most reliable launch service currently on Planet Earth, and the       only people recycling hardware (AFAIK - I'd love to hear about it if someone       else is doing it).              As some very bright person once said: "Sooner or later the Physics are the       same for Everybody." That means the only things that is stopping someone else       from copying SpaceX road to success are: Capital to Invest, Actual Industrial       Secrets, Patent Laws or        what?              SpaceX is a very public company, public in the sense that they're open and on       display, and don't seem to want to keep anything secret. The fabrication       techniques they are using are well known and understood, and widely used.              Their engines are a sensible evolution on technology that has existed since       the 60s. Their choice of fuel and oxidizer mix is different but hardly       revolutionary, and it has been studied and even tested on a small scale       before.               They likelihood that SpaceX has stumbled upon some wonderful mysterious new       process or science that makes their rockets fly better is extremely unlikely.       So no Actual Industrial Secrets, right?               Is the rest of the world so broke that NO ONE is willing to try catch up. I       can't believe that neither the Russians or Chinese are not at least looking at       the possibility of building their own SpaceX-like system. Of cause neither of       those countries have        the best record with recognizing or respecting patents held by foreign       companies or countries. So SpaceX's patents (if they hold any) are not going       to protect them from espionage and copying.              I understand that building a new rocket system is a long-winded affair. SpaceX       was in business for 8 (?) before it managed its first launch. But they have       demonstrated that reduced costs and reusing hardware can be done       profitably. So why no imitators? Or are all the imitators hiding in the       shadows, waiting to announce their SpaceX beater when they are ready to make       their debut flight?              Any thoughts? What am I missing?              Regards       Frank              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca