Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 104,791 of 106,651    |
|    Scott Kozel to JF Mezei    |
|    Re: Throttle down for max-q    |
|    07 Sep 20 08:43:52    |
      From: kozelsm@yahoo.com              On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 1:36:16 AM UTC-4, JF Mezei wrote:       >       > For conventional shaped rockets, I have no explanation. Accelerating       > the light carbon fairing doesn't involve a lot of energy compared to       > acceleratibg the fuel laden ET. So aerodynamic drag would by far be the       > largest force acting on it so reducing acceleration would be a small       > reduction on total force.              According to this, the Saturn V did not throttle down for Max Q.              'The Saturn V's first-stage engines don't throttle, so there's no "throttle       bucket" and no "go at throttle-up" call. One of the first-stage engines is       shut down late in the burn, but that's to limit maximum g-force for crew       comfort, not for Q limiting.'              https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/39768/did-the-saturn-v       have-the-status-check-go-at-throttle-up              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca