Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 104,853 of 106,651    |
|    Snidely to All    |
|    Re: OT: Planets    |
|    26 Sep 20 13:15:55    |
      From: snidely.too@gmail.com              David Spain pounded on thar keyboard to tell us              > And as a last test and biggest affront yet to our reader's sensibilities       > and USENET etiquette I am replying to my own post!*       >       > Wouldn't a passenger jet airplane be safer to go into space? It doesn't       > catch fire every single time and can hold a lot of people. You can even       > get something to eat and drink.       >       > This is so obvious! What's wrong with you people?              It's the getting from one side of the terminal to the other that's the       big problem with a passenger jet airplane.              >       > *Because it hasn't been done yet...              Nothing new under the sun.              /dps              --       "That’s where I end with this kind of conversation: Language is       crucial, and yet not the answer."        Jonathan Rosa, sociocultural and linguistic anthropologist,       Stanford.,2020              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca