Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 104,874 of 106,651    |
|    Sylvia Else to David Spain    |
|    Re: Traffic Jam at Canaveral    |
|    04 Oct 20 00:21:33    |
      From: sylvia@email.invalid              On 03-Oct-20 11:18 pm, David Spain wrote:       > It's not just ULA's DIV-H that is have trouble getting off the ground.       > SpaceX aborted its GPS-III launch last night at T-2 seconds.       >       > As traffic picks up I wonder if it all that helpful to schedule       > extremely narrow launch windows for uncrewed missions? Missing a narrow       > launch window doesn't allow for a recycle, even for the most trivial of       > fixes. Instead, a launch scrub pushes back on the schedule for       > everyone. And not necessarily just at Canaveral.       >       > Of course there is still weather. That is what it is. Launch schedules       > have to all take in the somewhat unpredictable. But you can provide       > yourself with options and fall-backs in lieu of scrubs. Not a big deal       > when launching once or twice a year, but 30+ times?       >       > We live in interesting times.       >       > Dave       >              The launch time determines the orbital plane. Unless a mission is       insensitive to that there's little option but to wait until until the       narrow window reopens. A small amount of plane change after launch is       possible, but it consumes fuel              Sylvia.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca