Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 104,927 of 106,651    |
|    Niklas Holsti to Alain Fournier    |
|    Re: High and far    |
|    13 Oct 20 09:14:28    |
      From: niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid              On 2020-10-13 2:48, Alain Fournier wrote:       > On Oct/12/2020 at 13:34, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote :       >> "Alain Fournier" wrote in message news:rm1mm4$12u$1@dont-email.me...       >>>       >>> On Oct/12/2020 at 09:15, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote :       >>>> "Dean Markley" wrote in message       >>>> news:b3ba9dee-3b09-479a-86a8-4a5698b98222n@googlegroups.com...       >>>>>       >>>>> On Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 11:46:52 AM UTC-4, Alain Fournier       >>>>> wrote:       >>>>>> Imagine you are out one night and you see a plane flying over your       >>>>>> head.       >>>>>> Someone might note that it is 10 km high. Now imagine that exactly       >>>>>> behind the plane is the Andromeda galaxy. No one is going to say t       >>>>>> hat       >>>>>> the galaxy is 2.5 million light years high, one would say it is 2.5       >>>>>> million light years away. Conversely, for the plane no one would       >>>>>> say it       >>>>>> is 10 km away if it is directly over head. So at what point does       >>>>>> something cease to be up and starts to be far.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Now this might seem like being only semantics, and it is. But I think       >>>>>> that discussing this particular point of semantics sheds light on how       >>>>>> people perceive space. I have my own opinion on the matter but I will       >>>>>> give it only after others have given their opinion, because I       >>>>>> don't want       >>>>>> this thread to be about discussing my opinion. I want it to be about       >>>>>> seeing what are the different opinions out there.       >>>>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Alain Fournier       >>>>> I suspect it is mostly human nature. At least around here, we       >>>>> consider anything north of us to be "up" there. Conversely,       >>>>> anything south is "down" there. Being on the east coast, anything       >>>>> west is "out" there.       >>>>>       >>>>> Dean       >>>>       >>>> I suspect anything that's within Earth's atmosphere is "high" and       >>>> even in most cases, if it's within the gravitational influence       >>>> "high" often applies.       >>>> Beyond that I think it's "out there" or "away".       >>>       >>> So for you the moon is high not away?       >>>       >>>       >>> Alain Fournier       >>       >> Like I said, "even in most cases". I've heard both.       >       > Personally I wouldn't say the Moon is high,              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_High_the_Moon              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca