Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 104,988 of 106,651    |
|    dumpster4@hotmail.com to All    |
|    Will NASA Use Nuclear Propulsion For Fas    |
|    24 Oct 20 14:38:29    |
      Are nuclear rockets the future of space travel? Or will the anti-nuke crowd       win        out?              "During an Oct. 9 Aviation Week webinar moderated by Space Editor Irene Klotz,        three former NASA administrators agreed that the U.S. needs to harness nuclear        technology to propel humans beyond low Earth orbit.              With the rapid development of the Chinese space program, the U.S. does not       have        the luxury of waiting to develop new technology, said Dan Goldin, who led NASA        during three presidential administrations from 1992 to 2001. “We’ve been       using        the same damn rocket technology since Apollo. It’s time to grow up and say       the        magic term ‘nuclear.’ There I said it, ‘nuclear,’” Goldin said.       “We’re going to        need nuclear power on planetary bodies. We’re going to need nuclear power       for        propulsion. And if America intends to be a world leader, we’re going to have       to        grow up and learn to live with nuclear.”              The U.S. has been exploring the technology for a long time, points out Sean        O’Keefe, NASA administrator during George W. Bush’s presidency in 2001-05.       But        he says the nation needs to pick up the pace. Project Prometheus, an in-space        propulsion effort started in 2003 to develop radioisotope power systems and        nuclear power and propulsion systems. The program was designed to support a        space science mission to study the icy moons of Jupiter, but it was scrapped       in        favor of higher priorities.              The technology in Prometheus “has been developed now to a much higher       extent,        but nowhere near as quickly as we needed to see significant changes over the        last 15 years,” O’Keefe said. “We’re in a better place now in terms of        developing that technology that has been used on a limited basis in the       past—to        seriously examining that as an in-space propulsion capacity. We just need to       do        it a hell of a lot faster.”"              See:              https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/space/will-nasa-use-nucle       r-propulsion-faster-crewed-mission-transport              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca