Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,007 of 106,651    |
|    Alain Fournier to Dean Markley    |
|    Re: Not a problem -- this time    |
|    30 Oct 20 20:45:48    |
      From: alain245@videotron.ca              On Oct/30/2020 at 07:43, Dean Markley wrote :       > On Friday, October 30, 2020 at 4:24:42 AM UTC-4, JF Mezei wrote:       >> On 2020-10-29 15:52, Snidely wrote:       >>> Two defunct orbital masses seem to have not collided.       >> If 2 satellites, devoid of any fuel, one in retrograde and the other in       >> normal orbit, both on same plane and roughly same mass, ended up       >> colliding face to face, what would happen?       >>       >> So we end up with a flat pankake that has 0 speed and drops straight down?       >>       >> Behave as two tennis balls that bounce off each other, with the       >> retrograde now in normal orbit and the normal orbit SV now in retrograde?       >>       >> Nuclear fission explosion that creates a black hole and sucks all of the       >> universe?       >>       >>       >> When a car hits a cement wall at speed, it doesn't tend to explode into       >> a billion bits flying out. Right? Just curious on what the actual       >> behavious of a satellte would be. Is the energy level such that his is       >> no longer a mechanical collision, and it behaves very differently?       >>       >> In the case of more likely collision (a 50° satellite hitting a nearly       >> equatorial orbit for instance) would the satellite really spread debris       >> all over the place or would they remain more or less whole (with big       >> deformation where collision happened) and just see their       >> trajectory/orbit changed?       >       > The Indian ASAT test ought to be a clear answer to your speculation.              Yes, the Indian (but also the Chinese and US) ASAT test gives a good       practical answer. But there are some interesting interactions going on       that, even if their practical implications are small, are interesting.       If two satellites, one prograde the other retrograde collide with a       collision speed of twice orbital velocity, at the point of impact, you       don't have metal bending like in a car accident. You have metal       vaporising, the result is more like an explosion than like a car       accident. That explains why the two don't just end up with zero velocity       and fall down. But it gets a little more complicated and more interesting.              As the ASAT test showed, some of the debris of the collision will end up       in an orbit with higher apogee than either the satellites had, meaning       that they end up with higher velocity. But the front of the satellite       obviously collides before the back of the satellite and it will start       being scattered in all direction while the back of the satellite hasn't       really had time to realize that it is in a collision. The front of the       satellite will scatter with some pieces having higher velocity than the       original satellites. So the back of the of the satellite can hit some       pieces of the front of the satellite with a collision speed even higher       than twice orbital velocity. This can give an even more explosive       collision, albeit with smaller pieces. This process can even be       multi-staged. The front of the satellite hits the front of the other       satellite, the middle of the satellite hits debris from the front of the       satellite with higher velocities and the the back of the satellite hits       the debris from the middle of the satellite with a yet again a higher       impact speed. Of course at each stage the debris hitting farther behind       parts of the satellite get smaller, but you can get some very small       pieces (individual atoms) completely ejected from Earth's gravity well       that way.              But all the pieces will end up in an orbit that passes by the collision       point (except tiny pieces which could be ejected from Earth's gravity       well). Essentially all pieces will have a perigee that will be lower       than the collision point. So, if the collision point is close to the       atmosphere, all pieces should be de-orbited in relatively short order.       But if the collision point is higher, you can have pieces with perigee       near the height of the collision point and apogee much higher. That can       be debris that will stay in orbit for a very long time.                     Alain Fournier              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca