Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,061 of 106,651    |
|    Niklas Holsti to JF Mezei    |
|    Re: Starship test    |
|    10 Dec 20 12:02:07    |
      From: niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid              On 2020-12-10 2:18, JF Mezei wrote:              > Based on the NASAspaceflight guys, the 3 engines aren't enough to launch       > a fully fueled Starship. This was likely the reason they had to scale       > back from 15 to 12.5km because it would have required too much fuel at       > liftoff and not enough power.              Another likely explanation I've seen is that they wanted to avoid       high-altitude winds at the transition from nose-up to belly-flop.              I don't think they would need to fully fuel the Starship just to reach       15 km altitude at low speed.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca