Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,109 of 106,651    |
|    Snidely to All    |
|    Re: Question about SSME/RS25 tests    |
|    18 Jan 21 22:12:19    |
      From: snidely.too@gmail.com              Lo, on the 1/18/2021, JF Mezei did proclaim ...       > On 2021-01-18 22:33, Snidely wrote:       >       >> SpaceX Boca Chica doesn't have a noise suppression system, or even a       >> flame diverter.       >       >       >       > Am quite surprised about the flame diverter missing.       > As for noise supression, considering location, is running engine for 8       > minutes intead of 30 seconds really that different considering its       > remote location?       >       >       > When a rocket launches for real, wouldn't the water noise suppression       > only be effective for a second or two after wish rocket is too high for       > the water to reduce noise?              It's about reducing vibrations in vehicle, not creature comfort for       observers.              /dps              --       Killing a mouse was hardly a Nobel Prize-worthy exercise, and Lawrence       went apopleptic when he learned a lousy rodent had peed away all his       precious heavy water.       _The Disappearing Spoon_, Sam Kean              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca