Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,126 of 106,651    |
|    David Spain to David Spain    |
|    Re: Test flight altuitude    |
|    25 Jan 21 09:48:00    |
      From: nospam@127.0.0.1              On 1/25/2021 9:43 AM, David Spain wrote:       > If successful then move on to Y. Note that if       > successful, and the engines/tanks etc. aren't damaged in any significant       > way, the next flight can take place quickly. Here quickly means weeks       > not months.              It just occurred to me, that if Starship is launching from a ring pad       (which it appears to be doing) to re-launch from a 'landing' pad it is       only necessary to hoist the dry mass Starship vertically and re-set on a       launch ring placed underneath. It isn't necessary to move to another       pad. I haven't see such an architecture, yet.              That might also save a great deal of time, since SpaceX is crane       plentiful....              Dave              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca