Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,145 of 106,651    |
|    Jeff Findley to All    |
|    Re: Moon landing for Starship    |
|    02 Feb 21 08:29:26    |
      From: jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com              In article <4H5SH.17368$fs1.16641@fx36.iad>,       jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca says...       > Since Blue Origin intends to have re-usable earth launcher, this       > eliminates the current huge cost advvamtage Space X has over those with       > disposable launchers. So at that point, the number of launches needed       > starts to matter.              Only the first stage of New Glenn will be reusable. Each flight will       expend its upper stage(s). Also, they've not launched or landed New       Glenn's first stage yet, so when they're learning, every first stage       will be expended.              And finally, you're asserting that a partially reusable system will be       cheaper than a fully reusable system. That's a stretch.              Jeff       --       All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.       These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,       employer, or any organization that I am a member of.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca