Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,147 of 106,651    |
|    Jeff Findley to All    |
|    Re: LEM disposal    |
|    02 Feb 21 13:48:42    |
      From: jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com              In article <3zeSH.68193$xa.35702@fx47.iad>,       jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca says...       >       > A few days ago, I was reading about the LEM, and found out that they       > were "disposed" of in different ways.       >       > Some were left in orbit around the moon but eventyally crashed in       > unknown locations.       >       > I beleive one was sent to some heliocentric orbit and would still be there.       >       > And the last ones were deliberately crashed onto the moon.       >       > So some questions:       >       > What are the parameters that would cause an orbiting LEM to end up       > crashing on the moon? Is there a thin atmosphere around the moon that       > would slow down an orbiting ship over time? Orbital precedence that       > would eventually result in some elliptical orbit that becomes more and       > more elliptical till perigy hits the ground?              The same thing that makes almost all lunar orbits unstable. The moon's       gravity field isn't uniform. It's got mascons (mass concentrations).              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_orbit#Perturbation_effects              Jeff       --       All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.       These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,       employer, or any organization that I am a member of.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca