Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,189 of 106,651    |
|    Dean Markley to JF Mezei    |
|    Re: Orbital mechanics question (elliptic    |
|    16 Feb 21 10:26:35    |
      From: damarkley@gmail.com              On Tuesday, February 16, 2021 at 12:24:28 PM UTC-5, JF Mezei wrote:       > Differnt spin to question:       >       > Assume again, Shuttle at at 300km circular, ISS at 400.       >       > I know that in normal life, on would accelerate horizontally to raise       > orbit.       >       > Now, what if the shuttle were to aim straight up and fire its engines to       > reach 400km altitude? (again in the context of a one shot meet lasting a       > few seconds with ISS).       >       > Would the resulting orbit still be 400*300 or would the Shuttle end up       > going lower than 300 at perigee because of the momentum from a harder       > fall down from 400 (since it would reach 400 without adding any orbital       > velocity) ?       >       > Is it correct to state that the Shuttle that shot straight up to 400km       > from 300 will end up at 400 with far less orbital speed/energy than the       > onle who accelerated forwards to convert circular into elliptical       > 400*300 orbit, or would they have to be mathenatically the same?       >       > It *seems* to me that the proper elliptical orbit would have greater       > speed because it did add delta V to its orbital speed to get there,       > whereas the "straigh up" one didn't. Or did that energy spent shooting       > straight up end up somehow being converted into orbital energy?       >       > Also, in a context where one removes risk-of hitting atmpsphere, would       > shooting straight up from 300 to reach 400 yield a new stable orbit       > apogee/perigee right away, or would apogee and perigee adjust over the       > course of many orbits since the boost to 400 was "unnatural" (aka: not       > done by increasing orbital speed).              Correct me if I am wrong but isn't orbital speed in a circular orbit       constant? And it is not constant in an elliptical orbit? In the latter, the       object moves faster at perigee and slower at apogee, correct?              Dean              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca