Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,290 of 106,651    |
|    jacob navia to All    |
|    Mars One is not feasible    |
|    01 Apr 21 12:00:56    |
      From: jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr              I have discovered that in a paper published in 2016, several researchers       undrscore that this project of colonization of Mars with a one trip       colony is UNFEASIBLE:              An independent assessment of the technical feasibility       of the Mars One mission plan – Updated analysis              Acta Astronautica 120 (2016) 192–228              They determine (for instance) that the crew would die after 58 days for       lack of CO2 for tyhe crops they need. And many other problems. Actually       this is a 100% suicide mission.              There is no alternative to robotic exploration in the immediate future.              As I have pointed out several times in this group, life in Mars was       discovered many times since the Viking lander. Life there would be wiped       out by human presence, what nobody seems to care a lot about.              I do. Life in Mars should be preserved from all the mostly commercial       interests pushing for a human Mars mission.              We have screwed this planet. Let's not repeat the same destructive       behavior in another one.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca