From: niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid   
      
   On 2021-04-01 18:29, Alain Fournier wrote:   
   > On Apr/1/2021 at 09:47, Jeff Findley wrote :   
   >> In article ,   
   >> niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid says...   
   >>>   
   >>> Bah. "Mars One" was an unprofessional stunt. The existence of one   
   >>> impractical plan does not prove the absence of practical plans.   
   >>>   
   >>> And lack of CO2 on Mars? Where the atmosphere is almost pure CO2?   
   >>> Ridiculous.   
   >>   
   >> Agree on both points.   
   >>   
   >> Jeff   
   >   
   >   
   > You probably haven't read the Acta Astronautica Jacob Navia cited to say   
   > that.   
      
      
   True, I haven't read it. I went only by Jacob's description. I'm quite   
   willing to believe that the Acta Astronautica article is good and   
   correct in its critique of Mars One, but I don't believe Jacob's claim   
   that this proves that other plans for Mars habitation are impossible too.   
      
      
   > You also have to take into account the yearly spacetime warp.   
      
      
   Huh? Missing smiley there?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)