Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,443 of 106,651    |
|    Sylvia Else to JF Mezei    |
|    Re: Landing precision    |
|    05 Jul 21 11:31:33    |
      From: sylvia@email.invalid              On 05-Jul-21 10:46 am, JF Mezei wrote:       > Noticed Falcon 9 doesn't actually land in the "X" but still within the       > cicles.       >       > (Considering they want Super Heavy to be caught by a cradle, thet would       > need greater presision().       >       > Has Elon provided any hints on what causes that imprecision in landing       > of Falcon 9?       >       > Is this an issue of GPS accuracy? Ship's inability to precisely station       > keep?       >       >       > I realize that it lands within needed specifications, but would have       > thought they would have fined tuned the software as a learning exercise       > to gain experience to do same with Super Heavy.       >              A video I watched recently commented that Falcon 9 cannot hover (the       thrust from one engine is too high). So it's doing a suicide-burn, which       limits its scope for fine-tuning the landing point.              Sylvia.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca