Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,563 of 106,651    |
|    Alain Fournier to JF Mezei    |
|    Re: Reusable rockets    |
|    26 Sep 21 08:18:29    |
      From: alain245@videotron.ca              On Sep/25/2021 at 15:36, JF Mezei wrote :       > On 2021-09-25 09:32, Alain Fournier wrote:       >       >> So have any of you heard about United Launch       >> Alliance, Arianespace, the Russians, the Chinese or others developing       >> reusable rockets or at least first stages?       >       >       > Launching from Baikonour to either ISS or equatorial orbit, where would       > stage 1 land? hint: not in Russia. And if landihg on land, you expect a       > precise target and what happens when you miss the target?       >       > They could launch from Russia and gain flexibility in where it lands,       > but how much performance would they lose launching from more northern       > latitude and would that reduce the buysiness case for re-usability?       > (considering Russia doesn't pay Los Angeles salaries to its employees       > who build the rockets as does SpaceX)              SpaceX frequently lands their Falcon 9 boosters at launch site. The       Russians could do the same. If you have a flight path where it is       acceptable to fly a rocket, knowing that the rocket could explode, it is       probably acceptable to land in a controlled fashion on that path.                     Alain Fournier              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca