Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,580 of 106,651    |
|    Snidely to All    |
|    Re: Starliner, will it ever fly?    |
|    19 Oct 21 22:56:41    |
      From: snidely.too@gmail.com              Sylvia Else pounded on thar keyboard to tell us       > On 20-Oct-21 3:18 pm, JF Mezei wrote:       >> Just read another article that says the next Boeing Starliner test       >> flight won't be before sometime in first half of 2022, and first manned       >> flight hopefully by end of 2022.       >>       >>       >> With SpaceX reliably providing the crew taxi/Uber service, Starliner       >> isn't needed. Is it possible that Boeing is trying to find a face-saving       >> way out of that contract for a Starliner nobody needs?       >>       >> Another possible reason would be lack of cash. Bombardier started 2       >> business jet and the C-series project concurrently, and the second the       >> C-Series was late, the company ran out of cash. Killing he Lear 85       >> wasn't enough and it ended up draining cash from all divisions, so the       >> rail division no longer had the cash to increase workforce to deliver on       >> time and within quality standards. (to a point where New York Cuty told       >> Bombarder to not bother bidding again). (All that is left of Bombardier       >> today is the Global 7500 and Challenger business jets, the rest of the       >> empire was all liquidated).       >>       >> With Boeing having problems with the 737 and 787, coumpounded with       >> COVID, if Starliner is not judged strategic, I could see why it would be       >> easy for Boeing to just starve it of the cash needed to boost       >> workforce/man hours to complete the project.       >>       >> What are the odds of Starliner getting finished and going into       >> production/manned launches vs Boeing and NASA agreeing that Starliner is       >> not needed anymore ?       >>       >       > I think I read somewhere, that Starliner has an ability to lift the orbit of       > the ISS that Dragon lacks. Unfortunately, I cannot find a reference.       >       > But even if that's true, NASA would certainly be better off paying SpaceX to       > develop that capability, than hoping that Starliner will eventually deliver.       >              NASA doesn't want a sole provider. They've already had that, and if       SpaceX had to stand down ....              /dps              --       "That’s where I end with this kind of conversation: Language is       crucial, and yet not the answer."        Jonathan Rosa, sociocultural and linguistic anthropologist,       Stanford.,2020              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca