Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,604 of 106,651    |
|    Sylvia Else to JF Mezei    |
|    Re: Clearing of space debris    |
|    20 Nov 21 10:24:27    |
      From: sylvia@email.invalid              On 18-Nov-21 6:50 am, JF Mezei wrote:       > Recent events have put a fair amount of debris in potential collision       > with ISS and I assume a bunch of LEO satellites. It isn't the first       > time and likely not the last.       >       > At the technical perspective, what concepts/technolopgies could       > pontentially be developped to make a vaccum cleaner for space?       >       >       > Say you can easiuly lauch a ship in same orbit as the debris field and       > it can sneak up behind it. Is the concept of using a laser to vaproize       > pieces of metal real or just science fiction? If you "laser" a piece of       > depris, does it just become small pellets of aliminium which then become       > bullets that penetrate ISS or other satellites? Or would it render the       > aluminium harmless ?       >       >       > It is possible to recreate re-entry conditions that destroy the pieces?       >       > Or is physically capturing the pieces, put them in a big bucket and       > de-orbiting the bucket the only way?       >       >       > Could one launch retrograde in that orbit and spread air in the orbital       > path at that altitude such that when the debris hit that air (which       > woudld be going at orbital sped in opposite direction) would slow down       > the debris and/or burn it up? (causing both debris and air to drop       > down).       >       >       > I am curious to see what science would come up with should there be a       > challenge of cleaning space debris equal to landing a man on the moon       > and returning him safely before the end of the decade.       >              The debris field tends to spread out, and it's not in a single orbit,       because the initial destruction imparted different velocities to the       bits, in all directions.              Sylvia.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca