Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,605 of 106,651    |
|    Alain Fournier to Sylvia Else    |
|    Re: Clearing of space debris    |
|    19 Nov 21 20:06:50    |
      From: alain245@videotron.ca              On Nov/19/2021 at 18:24, Sylvia Else wrote :       > On 18-Nov-21 6:50 am, JF Mezei wrote:       >> Recent events have put a fair amount of debris in potential collision       >> with ISS and I assume a bunch of LEO satellites. It isn't the first       >> time and likely not the last.       >>       >> At the technical perspective, what concepts/technolopgies could       >> pontentially be developped to make a vaccum cleaner for space?       >>       >>       >> Say you can easiuly lauch a ship in same orbit as the debris field and       >> it can sneak up behind it. Is the concept of using a laser to vaproize       >> pieces of metal real or just science fiction? If you "laser" a piece of       >> depris, does it just become small pellets of aliminium which then become       >> bullets that penetrate ISS or other satellites? Or would it render the       >> aluminium harmless ?       >>       >>       >> It is possible to recreate re-entry conditions that destroy the pieces?       >>       >> Or is physically capturing the pieces, put them in a big bucket and       >> de-orbiting the bucket the only way?       >>       >>       >> Could one launch retrograde in that orbit and spread air in the orbital       >> path at that altitude such that when the debris hit that air (which       >> woudld be going at orbital sped in opposite direction) would slow down       >> the debris and/or burn it up? (causing both debris and air to drop       >> down).       >>       >>       >> I am curious to see what science would come up with should there be a       >> challenge of cleaning space debris equal to landing a man on the moon       >> and returning him safely before the end of the decade.       >>       >       > The debris field tends to spread out, and it's not in a single orbit,       > because the initial destruction imparted different velocities to the       > bits, in all directions.       >       > Sylvia.              Yes. But all of the pieces that stay in orbit (some can re-enter       immediately, others may escape) should return to the point of impact.       At least initially. As you said, the field will spread out.                     Alain Fournier              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca