From: doc@tardis.org   
      
   On Sat, 13 Aug 2022 12:48:37 -0700 (PDT), pnn calmagorod   
    wrote:   
      
   >Il giorno mercoledì 10 agosto 2022 alle 19:47:17 UTC+2 Doctor Who ha scritto:   
   >> On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:42:51 -0700 (PDT), pnn calmagorod   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >Il giorno mercoledì 10 agosto 2022 alle 18:48:34 UTC+2 Doctor Who ha   
   scritto:   
   >> >> On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 12:43:12 -0400, Alain Fournier   
   >> >>  wrote:   
   >> >>   
   >> >> >On Aug/10/2022 at 11:20, pnn calmagorod wrote :   
   >> >> >> Il giorno mercoledì 10 agosto 2022 alle 16:49:06 UTC+2 Otto J. Makela   
   ha scritto:   
   >> >> >>> Doctor Who  wrote:   
   >> >> >>>   
   >> >> >>>> On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 17:42:09 +0300, o...@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela)   
   wrote:   
   >> >> >>>>> Alain Fournier  wrote:   
   >> >> >>>>>> You haven't worded that right. Thermal effects can produce real   
   >> >> >>>>>> thrust, not just illusion of thrust. Of course such thrust   
   >> >> >>>>>> disappears in a vacuum.   
   >> >> >>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>> Indeed, you are correct. Sorry for the inaccuracy, I should have   
   said   
   >> >> >>>>> "thermal effects, which produce the illusion of a reactionless   
   drive".   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> which isn't our case!   
   >> >> >>> Unfortunately, still to be proven. We'll be suitably impressed once   
   >> >> >>> you are able to reproduce the claimed thrust effects in a vacuum.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> H.Lorentz obtained nobel prize for his Lorentz force without no   
   experiments in vacuum :-)   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> more i never seem the measures of gold weight on a scale under vacuum   
   :-)   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> You dont't want see the elementary facts then invent ridicoulus and   
   very expensive for us conditions.   
   >> >> >> Then why with your allucinan theories don't reply to this? :   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> with Asps PNN (with batteries .. and remote control) if on a scale we   
   have thrust in a direction ... at 180 degree we have ANTI thrust :-)   
   >> >> >> we repeat this many times :-)   
   >> >> >> so you must invent something of realistic to explain such MANY facts   
   :-)   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >If you heat one side of your gizmo more than the other side you will   
   >> >> >push air molecules harder on one side than on the other side. This will   
   >> >> >give you some thrust. If you turn your gizmo 180 degrees, you will have   
   >> >> >thrust in the other direction. You can repeat that as many times as you   
   >> >> >want. That is not non-Newtonian propulsion.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >Alain Fournier   
   >> >> we insist that the thrust is due to the electromagnetic impulse, no   
   >> >> thermal effect can achieve such a thrust measured on a scale in both   
   >> >> directions (up and down).   
   >> >   
   >> >Secondo questo imbecille col botto uno scaldino a batterie e con   
   telecomando si alleggerisce o appesantisce su una bilancia ...   
   >> >per la variazione di massa dovrebbe essere una bomba atomica :-)   
   >> >Non c'è utilità a parlare con questi deficienti TOTALI   
   >> >   
   >> >e lallo   
   >> infatti, arragliano come i gotha, io li inserirei nella gothalist   
   >> majalagarden!   
   >   
   >sono zero di zero ...non posso perdere troppo tempo con questi imbecilli   
   rincoglioniti dalle scorregge dei razzi   
   >   
   >e lallo   
   >>   
   >> e lallo   
      
   anche io ho deciso di tagliare corto, sono troppo ossessionati dagli   
   effetti termici del cazzo.   
      
   e lallo   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)