From: doc@tardis.org   
      
   On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 21:01:06 +0300, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:   
      
   >Doctor Who  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 18:17:42 +0300, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:   
   >>> He seems to be of the opinion that thrust COULD be produced by the   
   >>> emission of electromagnetic waves in the space surrounding the   
   >>> dipole, but that this is not "reactionless", following well-known   
   >>> laws of preservation of momentum.   
   >>   
   >> whatever you want to call it, it works, the device is not a scam.   
   >   
   >If it isn't reactionless, it's not new physics, unlike your claims.   
      
   if it wasn't reactionless, or at least action > reaction, there would   
   be no thrust.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)