Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,899 of 106,651    |
|    David Spain to All    |
|    Re: Shuttle to the moon    |
|    14 Nov 22 08:55:19    |
      From: nospam@127.0.0.1              I'd love to see them shoehorn in the flight software for a pointless       trip to the moon. Pointless because, 1) It ain't landing on the moon,       and 2) it probably ain't carrying much cargo in lieu of fuel.              Shuttle was purpose built for LEO operation only. In fact, as originally       intended for military payloads, it acted primary as a reusable 2nd stage       for the Centaur upper-stage. Which post-Challenger accident, never flew       on Shuttle, but was adapted to the Titan IV.              Waving the re-usability flag means little when the cost to refurbish per       flight isn't better than or worse than an ELV. SpaceX got us off that       curve thank goodness.              Dave              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca