Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,902 of 106,651    |
|    Snidely to All    |
|    Re: Shuttle to the moon    |
|    15 Nov 22 02:25:15    |
      From: snidely.too@gmail.com              Just this Saturday, JF Mezei explained that ...       > Catching up on "For all Mankind" (season 2, I am very late).       >       > They depict the shuttle as going to/from the moon. Forgetting       > landing/taking off on moon (and reality):              [..]       > If this is within realm of "possible", would it have costed less than       > SLS to go around the moon? (and perhaps of there is space in payload       > bay, drop off a LEM and bring it back).              The changes you describe would require about as much redesign work as       SLS; you'd essentially have a whole new shuttle except for the RS25s       and the fragile tiles, and the shuttle would still be exposed to ice       debris.              /dps              --       I have always been glad we weren't killed that night. I do not know       any particular reason, but I have always been glad.        _Roughing It_, Mark Twain              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca